On 06/05/2012 06:22 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > At Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:43:05 +0800, > Liu Yuan wrote: >> >> On 06/04/2012 04:53 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: >> >>> One possibility is that if forward_write_obj_req() fails before >>> receiving data, the next forward_(read|write)_obj_req() could be >>> interleaved. >>> >>> The below untested patch may fix the problem though the approach is a >>> poor way. >> >> >> This fix doesn't fix anything. > > I think my patch will fix the bug I said above, though it doesn't fix > your problem. > >> I wrote a workaround: use connect_to() >> inside forward_write_obj_req(), and close(fd) when out of function. The >> problem is gone. > > I have no idea why the problem happens for now. I've not reproduced > it yet on my environment.
Hi Kazum You guessed right on the problem, but just the fix doesn't cover all the error cases. Finally I come up with an updated fix and this problem is gone. Thanks, Yuan -- sheepdog mailing list sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
