On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Jens WEBER wrote:
> a version number of the config file would also be nice then there is less
> magic
>
> struct sheepdog_config {
> + uint16_t configversion; <- what do you think
> uint64_t ctime;
> uint64_t space;
> uint16_t flags;
> uint8_t copies;
> uint8_t store[STORE_LEN];
Sounds like a good plan, but preferably the version number should be
after the old config data, so that the lack of it can be used to signal
that it is a "version 0" format.
--
sheepdog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
