On 08/07/2012 07:20 PM, levin li wrote: > If we only store the copies data in memory, then after restart the > copies data is lost, and we can only try to read the inode data to > get the copies data, which is expensive
Is this really necessary? We need a lot of code to manage the local vdi copy number. This code open a window that we need a lot of more code to do it right: - should also handle vdi deletion on EVERY node. - should maintain the consistency of local vdi cp_nr against cluster. For e.g, after restart, some vdi has already been deleted when the node is down, how do you handle it? I don't like this idea, it seems that bring much more trouble than it solves. -- thanks, Yuan -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
