At Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:34:24 +0800, Yunkai Zhang wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:20 PM, MORITA Kazutaka > <morita.kazut...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > At Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:46:55 +0800, > > Yunkai Zhang wrote: > >> > >> When inconsistency happens, in the worst case, we just need to make > >> replicas with the same value but needn't to care about which replica > >> is correct. > >> > >> But in the best case, only several objects were polluted, then this > >> patch can give us a chance to verify them, This patch is used to work > >> with 'collie vdi check' command, that is my original intention when > >> developed it. > > > > Well, replica inconsistency happens only when the VM terminates > > unexpectedly. If the vm image needs a fix, the guest os filesystem > > should fix it. What sheepdog should do is only keeping consistency so > > Can you explain how the guest os files system fix it?
I meant fsck. I don't fully understand yet what situation you want to avoid. What kinds of problem happens to you if you fix consistency with wrong objects? Thanks, Kazutaka -- sheepdog mailing list sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
