At Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:33:51 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > > On the second thought, I concluded that the concept of taking deep > copy of living VDI is not good. If planned maintenance window is > provided, there is a chance of making clone with --no-share. It is > enough for VID recycling. This patch reverts them. > > Hitoshi Mitake (4): > Revert "tests/functional: add a new test for checking fast deep copied > snapshot" > Revert "sheep, dog: fast deep copy for snapshot" > Revert "tests/functional: add a test for deep copied snapshots" > Revert "sheep, dog: support deepcopy snapshot" > > dog/dog.h | 3 +- > dog/farm/farm.c | 2 +- > dog/vdi.c | 189 ++++-------------------------------------- > include/internal_proto.h | 1 - > include/sheepdog_proto.h | 7 +- > sheep/ops.c | 17 ---- > sheep/sheep_priv.h | 2 - > sheep/vdi.c | 211 > +---------------------------------------------- > tests/functional/100 | 50 ----------- > tests/functional/100.out | 39 --------- > tests/functional/101 | 26 ------ > tests/functional/101.out | 16 ---- > tests/functional/group | 2 - > 13 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 542 deletions(-) > delete mode 100755 tests/functional/100 > delete mode 100644 tests/functional/100.out > delete mode 100755 tests/functional/101 > delete mode 100644 tests/functional/101.out
I forgot to sign-off... I'll resend the v2. Thanks, Hitoshi > > -- > 1.9.1 > -- sheepdog mailing list sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
