"Garrett D'Amore" <gdamore at sun.com> wrote:
> I don't mean for that at all. But the change of the default path is
> being handled as part of PSARC 2010/067 -- i.e. that is the case (and
> its still open) that started this whole mess. I'm not a fan of the fact
> that the case is closed, but I cannot discuss rationale for it being
> closed in public, which I'm sure you understand.
My understanding of "OpenSolaris" is that uses a liberal license that
allows distributors to add closed parts. Internal decisions that affect
the closed parts only may of course be handled in a closed case.
My impression is however that a discussion about changing the default PATH
is a discussion that affects all parts of Opensolaris and thus of course
affects "OpenSolaris" as a community platform (not a distro). For this reason,
related discussions should be made in the open.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
