On 11/07/13 17:59, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Hi, > > Antoine Martin <[email protected]> writes: >> Which encoding were you testing? > x264 This should have worked fine, certainly better than jpeg!
>> If it was a lossy one, have you tried increasing the auto-refresh delay >> so lossless frames don't fire too often? > Thanks for the advice. It seems that > > xpra attach --encoding jpeg --quality 5 --auto-refresh-delay=1000 > ssh:example.org:7 > > is usable even after I have limited the bandwidth on the server using > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 512kbit latency 20ms burst 60kbit > >> How so? jpeg encoding is still supported and so is the quality setting. >> That said, jpeg encoding is terrible, you should be using x264 >> instead. > Even with > > xpra attach --encoding jpeg --quality 5 --auto-refresh-delay=1000 > ssh:example.org:7 > > I see only very minimal artifacts, I'm sure I used to see much worse > quality in the past. Is it maybe ignoring --quality 5 and assuming > --quality 70 or something? That's probably the auto-refresh kicking in before you realize. jpeg at quality=5 is unusable otherwise Antoine > > -Timo > _______________________________________________ > shifter-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.devloop.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/shifter-users _______________________________________________ shifter-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.devloop.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/shifter-users
