On 26/07/17 21:55, Eric Grammatico via shifter-users wrote: > Hello There, > > I have very poor performances with html5 client. Is this a regression from 2.0?
> I had a look in the code and I saw h264 may be available. Thus I have > modified Client.js with: No need to modify anything, there's an option in advanced settings on the connect dialog page. (snip)> 2017-07-26 14:33:22,309 HTML5 Linux Chrome client version 2.1 > 2017-07-26 14:33:22,310 as 'eric' > 2017-07-26 14:33:22,310 via Linux 4.11.10-100.fc24.x86_64 proxy version 2.1 > on 'xpra-proxy' > 2017-07-26 14:33:22,312 automatic picture encoding enabled > 2017-07-26 14:33:22,314 also available: > 2017-07-26 14:33:22,314 jpeg, png, rgb32, h264, vp8+webm, h264+mp4, mpeg4+mp4 It shows "auto" because that's the best encoding selection policy available, it may use any of the encodings available, including "h264". > As the performance are still poor, I believe h264 is stil not selected... It probably is used, but it is hidden in the advanced options because it doesn't work reliably. I don't recommend it. > How can I have better performance with HTML2 ? Please file a ticket with enough details. Cheers Antoine > > Tested with Firefox and Chromium. > > thanks and best regards, > - > Eric Grammatico _/) > _______________________________________________ > shifter-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.devloop.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/shifter-users > _______________________________________________ shifter-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.devloop.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/shifter-users
