+1 do it. On Dec 14, 2007 5:58 PM, John Hjelmstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why yes I am, assuming nobody registers an objection reasonably soon. > > On Dec 14, 2007 5:54 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Are you volunteering? :) > > > > On Dec 14, 2007 4:56 PM, John Hjelmstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Why not just do a bulk change right off the bat? +1 on it being a good > > > idea. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Dec 14, 2007 4:50 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > It sounds perfectly reasonable to me; We should just change it as we > > go, > > > > though. > > > > > > > > On Dec 14, 2007 3:13 PM, Louis Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that the Shindig code is using java.net.URL which has > some > > > > well > > > > > known performance issues in its 'equals' method. I think Shindig > can > > > > > happily > > > > > use java.net.URI instead and avoid those performance pitfalls and > > > shield > > > > > consumers > > > > > > > > > > Sound reasonable? > > > > > > > > > > -Louis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
