Great question. Your expectation contains nearly the semantics I'd suggest and have implemented with one modification: the DEFAULT doesn't show up when view="bar". <Content> without view, or with view="" is equivalent to view="default". This facilitates shared code between the default content block and other views. Without it, the default block would have to stand on its own, while at the same time always being included in the alternate specified views.
For a while I was a proponent of precluding repeated view definitions altogether, but this mechanism is an elegant way to accommodate shared code IMO. Thoughts? John On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Arne Roomann-Kurrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What happens when multiple content sections specify the same view? > > <Content view="bar"> BAR </Content> > <Content view="foo, bar"> FOO+BAR </Content> > <Content> DEFAULT </Content> > > If the current view is "bar", what is the expected result? (I would > expect > "BAR FOO+BAR DEFAULT", but wanted to get clarification) >
