Arun - I *think* Kevin was referring to the last part of this thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-shindig-dev/200802.mbox/browser
I always get confused by the ifpc stuff :), but the main idea I gathered from that is that the gadget is no longer on a domain that we trust and control (because it is just whatever url the gadget specified). This means that we can't use the current solution for ifpc, where the whole parent page creates an iframe in the same domain as the gadget iframe and vice versa, because the parent page would have to create an iframe in the same domain as that random site. I believe that the ifpc_relay.html would also be a problem because we would have to trust that the gadget's site has the correct file up in the right place. (I also gathered that we could eventually fix this though, it just wasn't trivial) Let us know if i screwed up that explanation or if neither Kevin's thread nor my response makes sense. - Cassie On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Arun Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you please give me a link to the messages related to this on archive? > > On Feb 4, 2008 11:36 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > type=url support is completely broken for anything that requires ifpc at > > present (including dynamic-height). See the archives of this mailing > list > > for the gritty details. > > > > On Feb 4, 2008 2:49 AM, Arun Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > In gadget xml file, I use <content type="url" href="xxxx.html" /> > > > > > > In this case, how can I use dynamic-height feature? > > > > > >
