Very good point... do you think you can make that happen? :)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We probably need to make it so that you can overwrite an existing feature
> when calling registerFeature; as well -- otherwise the new opensocial-0.7is
> going to conflict with existing opensocial implementations, and
> maintaining
> patches sucks. This will go away as the opensocial feature implementation
> is
> fleshed out and people migrate to actually using it for their real data,
> of
> course.
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:52 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Author: doll
> > Date: Thu Feb 21 18:52:10 2008
> > New Revision: 630074
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630074&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Removed accidental dependency of opensocial-reference on ifpc. If your
> > opensocial-0.7 feature needs this dependency you should add it to your
> > feature.xml file.
> >
> >
> > Modified:
> >    incubator/shindig/trunk/features/opensocial-reference/feature.xml
> >
> > Modified:
> > incubator/shindig/trunk/features/opensocial-reference/feature.xml
> > URL:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/shindig/trunk/features/opensocial-reference/feature.xml?rev=630074&r1=630073&r2=630074&view=diff
> >
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- incubator/shindig/trunk/features/opensocial-reference/feature.xml
> > (original)
> > +++ incubator/shindig/trunk/features/opensocial-reference/feature.xml
> Thu
> > Feb 21 18:52:10 2008
> > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@
> >  -->
> >  <feature>
> >   <name>opensocial-reference</name>
> > -       <!-- all known opensocial implementations assume that ifpc is
> > present. -->
> > -       <dependency>ifpc</dependency>
> >   <gadget>
> >     <script src="opensocial.js"/>
> >     <script src="activity.js"/>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ~Kevin
>
> If you received this email by mistake, please delete it, cancel your mail
> account, destroy your hard drive, silence any witnesses, and burn down the
> building that you're in.
>

Reply via email to