Hmm... so force-reloading wasn't working for my java based container.
And also, your attached diff unfortunately didn't make it through.

Perhaps this is just a me-only problem, has anybody else gotten this to
work?
Thanks.

- Cassie


On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've been able to confirm this by adding a &time=<time in ms> to the
> IFRAME src tag (in the javascript/container/gadgets.js
>  gadgets.IfrGadget.prototype.getIframeUrl function)
>
> I've attached a diff for what works for me here locally. It's probably not
> the right way to fix it but something of a work-around, but at least with
> this the samples are working correctly for me :)
>
> Oh ps, sample7.html wasn't working for me either while for instance
> sample2.html was (both with a config that included a /gadgets/files/...
> parentRelayUr), it turns out the difference between the two is that sample7
> includes:
>
>        gadgets.container.setParentUrl("http://"; + document.location.host +
> '/');
>
> And hence the final url was http://myhost//gadgets/... (notice the double
> /, which made the (php-) server break), by removing this line everything
> worked as it was supposed to again.
>
>
>        -- Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Chris Chabot wrote:
>
>  I got the same problem here with the sample?.html files: "Invalid auth
> > token", and it might be a PHP shindig only problem i have here that
> > coincidentally gives the same error, but maybe it's not coincidence so i'll
> > post what i've found here anyhow :)
> >
> > Basically what i've found with some console.log'ing is that on a first
> > page load (or forced reload) i get (console.log("auth comp:
> > "+authToken[rpc.f]+" = "+rpc.t);)
> >
> > auth comp: 1185834238 = 1185834238
> >
> > but when i do a 'soft reload' (so no forced reload) i get:
> >
> > auth comp: 201272794 = 1185834238
> >
> > So it's still using the old token from the previous request, hence the
> > token's aren't identical, and you get an auth token error.
> >
> > Since the original report said that when Arne changed the URL it worked,
> > now it might not have been a absolute vs relative URL problem, but just have
> > forced the browser to reload the frame's, and hence working again (a second
> > refresh after that would've shown i think that it was still 'broken')
> >
> >        -- Chris
> >
> >
> > On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
> >
> >
> > > It shouldn't -- auth token validation is based on the iframe id, not
> > > the
> > > url. I'll take a look.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>

Reply via email to