Definitely, I misunderstood thinking if the callback was specified it had to
be executed.

I do think developers will need the ability to do some post-invite action
via some extra parameters though, will follow up on the spec mailing list
once I¹ve got something to propose.

Thanks!
Lou


On 3/21/08 5:37 AM, "Cassie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The contract of the callback is this:
> - it is either executed -or- the entire gadget is reloaded
> 
> so, if you stay on the same page when sharing the app (ie with a pop up or
> something) then you have to call the callback. if you go through an different
> page flow entirely then its fine for the gadget to just have its onload
> handler called. 
> 
> which means, that as far as the spec goes your implementation is good. it does
> seem like we may want to give developers a way to know what happened though...
> or the ability to request a view to navigate to like you said. perhaps propose
> something on the spec mailing list if you figure out a good way to do it.
> 
> I hope that helps.
> 
> - cassie
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Lou Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Has anyone else implemented requestShareApp yet? Just got started on our
>> implementation, and we have it all working except the callback. We register
>> requestShareApp as an rpc method which sends the user to our invite page,
>> passing along the reason and callback, and on completion we send them back to
>> the view they came from. What was the thinking on how containers are expected
>> to invoke the specified callback at that point? Also, it seems like it might
>> actually be more useful to just pass along view-params similar to
>> requestNavigateTo, as the desired behavior for developers is really just to
>> show a specific post-invite page to the user, but the spec calls for a
>> callback function instead.
>> 
>> Or, are we going about this in a totally unexpected way?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Lou 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hi5-opensocial mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://mailman.corp.google.com/mailman/listinfo/hi5-opensocial
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to