On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Bipin Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I am required to run a general PHP app on one server, and the Shindig > app on another. For now, I am running Shindig on port 80, and a simple > html file which has a simple, but configurable, \"Hello World\" gadget > embedded. > The exact scenario: > 1. Shindig App is on port 80, and working fine. > 2. The HTML file is on port 8080 > 3. The javascript files, like gadgets.js, util.js, etc, are on 80 and > have been linked using the complete URL. (Note: They are all linked > properly. firebug gives no error about these files). > 4. The Gadget XML is also on 8080. > > > When I try to render the page on 8080, I get the following error: > __Not Found > > The requested URL /ifr was not found on this server.__ > > Pretty clearly, it\'s try to contact something like > __localhost:8080/ifr?....__ instead of ___localhost/gadgets/ifr?...__ > Now my queries are: > 1. Is this even possible? I mean, to keep the general app and Shindig > on separate servers. Not just possible, but essential. You should never run a gadget renderer on the same port (really, you shouldn't even use the same domain) in a production scenerio. We run everything on the same host / port by default because it makes development easier. > 2. Would gadget.setServerBase() be of any use here? When I try to add > it, Firebug throws error that *gadget is not defined*. Are you talking about the sample container and examples? If so, yes -- you need to modify the server base. I wouldn't recommend using this code on a real site though. > > I\'d really appreciate a quick reply. > Also, apologies for not doing the homework properly. I don\'t > generally do that, but have a deadline to meet. > > > > -- Bipin Upadhyay > I\'d love to change the world, > but they won\'t gimme the source code. > http://projectbee.org/ >
