It's an HTTP fetcher, so file:// support is purely a fluke in my opinion. On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BasicHttpFetcher currently has support for fetching file:// URLs. The > only place I can find that used is in test code for BasicHttpFetcher, > and I don't think it's particularly useful there. I'm adding more > test cases to the http fetching classes. > > Objections to me removing the file:// support? > > (It looks like both Kevin and Paul have plans to use the apache > commons HTTP client. I'm writing the regression tests for when they > do that. =) >
