Its not about a monitor, imagine you have to take a look at some code on a
production system in a unix system with only its terminal, the 120 lines
could fit in there ;)
Regards.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use 120, personally. If anyone is still stuck on an 80 column terminal,
> email me offline and I'll send you a monitor :-)
>
> -Brian
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Ropu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > and for PHP stuff?
> >
> >
> > Each language is different. PHP is far less verbose than Java, so it's
> not
> > as big of an issue. Java has this ugly mess littered all over the place:
> >
> > for (Map.Entry<String, Collection<String>> entry :
> > request.getHeaders().entrySet() {
> > }
> >
> > Whereas in PHP similar code is:
> >
> > foreach ($request->getHeaders() as $key=>$values) {
> > }
> >
> > This thread is only dealing with the Java case in order to get things
> > consistent going forward.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > i would recommend 100perLine too.
> > >
> > > but many code must be rewriten.
> > >
> > > ropu
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2008/6/10 Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 for 100, (but not a committer, so not a strongly held view),
> > > > >> however
> > > > >> +1 for consistency to reduce ease of patching.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Reduce ease of patching? :)
> > > >
> > > > Oops, increase :)
> > > > Sorry
> > > > Need caffeine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ian
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2008/6/10 Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > >> > I'm in favor of 100. I find that even with 2 char indents that
> we
> > > > line
> > > > >> wrap
> > > > >> > more code than I'm used to. That causes readability to suffer.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Jun 10, 2008, at 1:22 AM, Kevin Brown wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> Our style guide calls for 80 columns (
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/SHINDIGxSITE/java-style.html#JavaStyle-Linewrapping
> > > > >> >> .)
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Unfortunately, this hasn't been followed very well, so that
> > leaves
> > > us
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> >> two options:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> - Modify all the existing code to 80 columns.
> > > > >> >> - Up the limit to 100 columns (covers existing code, still
> narrow
> > > > enough
> > > > >> >> for
> > > > >> >> most terminals).
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Any strong opinions on this one?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Paul Lindner
> > > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > .-. --- .--. ..-
> > > R o p u
> > >
> >
>
