On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have had good experiences with trees of maps and lists containing
> > primitive types, serialized by json-lib. The same trees are easy to
> > serialize using the apache xml-rpc libraries, and appear to stack-up
> > reasonably well underload. Its not sophisticated, but it is fast to
> > work with, light on the GC under load and appears to perform well.
>
>
> The JSONObject library being used right now handles primitives and
> containers already (JSONObject.put(Map), JSONObject.put(Collection)), as
> well as bean-style objects (JSONObject.put(Object)). That doesn't handle
> the
> conversion back, though, which is where a library would come in handy.


I just added this.. so now it does both :)


>
> This isn't just an issue for the social data, either -- the metadata
> handler
> is currently doing all this by hand, and it would be much more convenient
> to
> just have an annotation processor or something along those lines.
>
>
> >
> > I was going to try  abdera in another project, now I am not so sure.
> >
> > 2008/6/10 Cassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > We tried to use abdera to implement the opensocial json restful format
> > > within Shindig.. and it didn't work out very well. The code is clunky,
> > > overly complicated for simple json and is hard to come up to speed on.
> > >
> > > So... I am going to try an alternate implementation based on the
> existing
> > > older json wire format code. I was going to start coding something in a
> > > separate dir so that none of the current code is disturbed. Hopefully,
> in
> > > the next couple days we will have a cleaner impl of the restful json
> that
> > is
> > > 90% the same as all of the current social code. (this means less
> > migration
> > > for current social code users too, yea!)
> > >
> > > And as for atom... well, we can figure that out later :)
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you have any huge objections to this.
> > > And of course, if it turns out to be worse than the abdera impl.. we
> can
> > > always go back.
> > >
> > > - Cassie
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to