On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Cassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:14 AM, David Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I'm not familiar enough with the details to have an opinion on the best >> > implementation, but I do have some thoughts.on process for resolution: >> > >> > - if I understand right, there's an already-committed, partially >> complete, >> > abdera-based implementation for format=atom requests >> > - by the end of the week, we expect there to be a new, partially >> complete, >> > non-abdera-based implementation for format=json requests >> > - at that point we have four options: >> > a) shift all our weight to the abdera-based path, adding any missing >> > features and json support >> > b) shift all our weight to the new path, adding any missing features and >> > atom support >> > c) continue with two parallel implementations, finishing each >> independently >> > d) press reset and find a new approach >> >> Here's my $0.02: I think option (a) is the best choice. Having >> implemented AtomPub once myself (ROME Propono), I don't the idea of >> trying to whip-up a new AtomPub implementation for XML or JSON when >> such a complete, compliant, pluggable and well-supported one already >> exists right here at Apache. > > Well, the code will tell, right? > No need for conjecturing - we will just see which one fits best.
Yes. I am willing to be convinced and I look forward to seeing what you come up with. - Dave
