Nah - that's package protected. So Dave, I just double checked, you can make all of the DataRequestHandlers protected instead of package protected and everything should work dandily for your sub class. protected will be better than public.
- Cassie On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Ropu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if you are in the same package... > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Cassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wait a sec. Can't you just make everything protected? Then your subclass > > should work fine. > > > > - Cassie > > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Cassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I guess that's fine although we might need an interface at some point > > then > > > so that it is clear what the actual contract of the DataRequestHandler > > is. > > > > > > - Cassie > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I'd like plugin my own DataRequestHandlers, but the DataRequestHandler > > >> class seems to be designed to prevent subclassing. Would you consider > > >> changing or accepting a patch to make the protected and package > > >> protected methods into public methods so the class can be extended? > > >> > > >> - Dave > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > .-. --- .--. ..- > R o p u >
