(not a response to the actual proposal, more of a general thing):
Remember that the RESTful spec also mentioned having an indexBy, so
that should be added (in whichever interface definition). An indexBy
should have the following result (cut&paste from spec doc):
{
"entry" :
[
{ "id" : "example.org:34KJDCSKJN2HHF0DW20394", "pokes" : 3,
"last_poke" : "2008-02-13T18:30:02Z" },
{ "id" : "example.org:58UIDCSIOP233FDKK3HD44", "pokes" : 2,
"last_poke" : "2007-12-16T18:30:02Z" }
]
}
application/json representation (with indexBy=id):
{
"entry" : {
"example.org:34KJDCSKJN2HHF0DW20394" : {"pokes" : 3,
"last_poke" : "2008-02-13T18:30:02Z" },
"example.org:58UIDCSIOP233FDKK3HD44" : {"pokes" : 2,
"last_poke" : "2007-12-16T18:30:02Z" }
}
}
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:57 AM, Cassie wrote:
public ResponseItem<RestfulCollection<T>> getItems(UserId userId,
GroupId groupId, String appId, Set<String> fields, SortOrder
sort,
SortDirection direction, FilterType filter,
int first, int max, SecurityToken token);
