On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm still very hopeful to see is a Wiki system (any flavor will do) > for Shindig. > > The lack of documentation and possibilities for people to contribute too- > has really held our adoptation back a bit, and caused many duplicate threads > on the same subjects to happen. > > On the other hand i remember infrastructure@ saying that a zone should not > be used for anything important? Yeah, I'd be cautious about anything that needs to persist data on the zone. A hosted wiki would probably work. google sites might work ok for this, though I still prefer something like MediaWiki in general. > > > Thoughts? > > -- Chris > > > On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Kevin Brown wrote: > > [+shindig-dev, This doesn't belong on shindig-private] >> >> A sample running on ASF infrastructure probably isn't going to happen. >> Continuous integration will, but it's not really reasonable to expect >> apache >> infrastructure to maintain the kind of secure setup that an opensocial >> container needs, and it'd be far too easy for someone to screw it up to >> subject said infrastructure to those kinds of security risks. There's >> really >> no strong reason for running a shindig build on apache infrastructure, and >> that wasn't the reason for requesting the zone in the first place. >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Dan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> (bcc: infra-private) >>> >>> Shindig-private, can someone summarize and get this ball moving on >>> shindig-dev? >>> >>> It'd be nice to have the sample running on Apache's infrastructure with >>> periodic builds. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Dan >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can we please move this conversation about the domain >>>> name off infra-private now, and put it on shindig-dev >>>> instead? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> --- On Thu, 7/10/08, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Subject: Re: A zone! >>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >>>>> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Ben Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>>> Date: Thursday, July 10, 2008, 6:12 PM >>>>> Why have shindig in the name? This is only used for >>>>> rendering >>>>> iframes, it never shows up in the URL bar at all. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> How about shindiggadgets.org ? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 14:59 -0700, Brian Eaton wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Henning >>>>>>> >>>>>> Schmiedehausen >>>>> >>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let's go with >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> "shindigcontainer.org" or >>>>> "apache-shindig.org". Everyone >>>>> >>>>>> will know what is meant. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Will they? To me "apache-shindig.org" >>>>>>> >>>>>> means "This is code provided by >>>>> >>>>>> the Apache Shindig project". That's not >>>>>>> >>>>>> true at all for gadgets. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm still leaning towards amodules.org. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Nothing Apache or Shindig >>>>> >>>>>> branded, this is third-party code. >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | JEE, >>>>>> >>>>> Linux, Unix >>>>> >>>>>> 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | >>>>>> >>>>> Apache Java Software >>>>> >>>>>> Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | >>>>>> >>>>>> INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG >>>>>> >>>>> Fuerth, HRB 7350 >>>>> >>>>>> Gesellschaftssitz: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: >>>>>> >>>>> Henning Schmiedehausen >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> char name_buf[257]; /* max unix filename is >>>>>> >>>>> 256, right? */ >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
