On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:44 PM, John Hjelmstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So did we conclude that the right thing to do is revert my CL and instead
> "fix" GadgetRenderingTask.java to look for isAnonymous()?

Maybe, though I'm still curious as to why securityToken != null and
securityToken.isAnonymous() have different semantics.

Reply via email to