FWIW, I'm +1 on 0.8.1 and -0 on 1.0.x (not going to -1 it but think it will be a headache). I think it will be a big source of confusion trying to map Shindig revisions to spec revisions:
OpenSocial <-> Shindig 0.8.1 1.0.23 0.9.0 1.1.7 0.9.1 1.2.23 0.9.1 1.3.3 1.0.0 1.4.7 ... 2.0.0 3.5.8 This may be a little different than other cases because our major Shindig revisions will be very closely tied to spec revisions for a while to come. I don't think this is often the case. Anyway, just wanted to give my support for the 0.8.1.x versioning. Evan On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok a quick count shows that we have quite a few +1's on the > shindig-1.0.0-rc1-incubating release name (with the final release after > it's > been been through a reasonable amount of testing in the real world being > 'shindig-1.0.0-incubating'), and I think just one +1 from Dan Peterson for > shindig-0.8.1-1. > > Dan, are you going -1 on the shindig-1.0.0-rc1-incubating naming scheme, or > can you live with it? And if your going -1, could you please outline your > objections so the kind folks who prefer it can try to persuade you? > > -- Chris > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 to shindig-1.0.0-rc1-incubating > > > > however, in that release there must be very clear documentation > surrounding > > spec compliance at each level. > > > > eg > > full compliance with the OpenSocial 0.8.1 Specification except for the > > following known issues. etc etc etc > > partial implementations of the following features in the OpenSocial 0.9 > > Specification etc etc etc > > > > eventually I would expect some version 1.x.x to implement OpenSocial > > version 1.0 > > > > This is not far from Jackrabbits relationship with JSR-170 (JCRv1) and > > JSR-283 (JCRv2) the current release of Jackrabbit being 1.4.5 (about) > > implementing JCRv1, work in trunk is targeting a 2.0.x release > implementing > > JCRv2 > > > > Ian > > > > On 2 Dec 2008, at 04:59, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > > > > Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> As I triggered the thread: Yes, +1 to shindig-1.0.0-rc1-incubating. > >> > >> Ciao > >> Henning > >> > >> +1 to releasing as "shindig-1.0.0-incubating" > >>> > >> > >> The files you put up for release vote should probably be > >>> "shindig-1.0.0-rc1-incubating" > >>> > >> > >> - Dave > >>> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> So the thanks-giving-holiday is over in the US (which I'm suspecting > >>>> lead to > >>>> the lack of feedback on this thread), lets wait for the day time to > >>>> start in > >>>> the US time zone and see what others think about the current > discussion > >>>> :) > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen < > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> > >>>>> is there any conflict between calling something '1.0.0' and still > >>>>>> being in > >>>>>> incubation? Is this something we want to reflect in the versioning > or > >>>>>> not? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> No, incubation has nothing to do with this. As Upayavira already > >>>>> wrote, this will be "shindig-1.0.0-incubating" anyway. To drop the > >>>>> "-incubating" postfix, Shindig needs to graduate. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ciao > >>>>> Henning > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Henning P. Schmiedehausen - Palo Alto, California, U.S.A. > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "We're Germans and we use Unix. > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's a combination of two demographic > >>>>> groups > >>>>> known to have no sense of humour > whatsoever." > >>>>> -- Hanno Mueller, > >>>>> de.comp.os.unix.programming > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> -- > >> Henning P. Schmiedehausen - Palo Alto, California, U.S.A. > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "We're Germans and we use Unix. > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's a combination of two demographic > >> groups > >> known to have no sense of humour whatsoever." > >> -- Hanno Mueller, > de.comp.os.unix.programming > >> > > > > >
