Actually the comment mentions that this is experimental, thus the maxElementsInMemory setting of 0 disables the cache.

Anyone know more about this? Is it safe to enable? What performance gains are realized?

<!-- By default do not cache any parsed documents. This is experimental -->
  <cache name="parsedDocuments"
    maxElementsInMemory="0"
    eternal="true"
    overflowToDisk="false"
    diskPersistent="false"
    memoryStoreEvictionPolicy="LFU"/>


Also, has anyone have experience with distributed ehcache configurations? It might be interesting to see how this operates in a cluster.



On Dec 19, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Kevin Brown wrote:

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote:

I keep seeing this message in my console. How do I fix it?

      Cache: parsedDocuments has a maxElementsInMemory of 0. It is
strongly
      recommended to have a maximumSize of at least 1. Performance is
halved
      by not using a MemoryStore.


It's a warning. If you don't want to see it, either don't use ehcache or else set an appropriate value (I'd recommend at least equal to the number of unique gadgets you expect to run) in the ehcache configuration xml file.




Jordan Zimmerman
Principal Software Architect
831.647.4712
831.214.2990 (cell)
[email protected]

SHOP*COMTM
All your favorite stores.
OneCart(r) convenience.
www.shop.com



This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and
(i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this
message
immediately if this is an electronic communication.

Thank you.


Paul Lindner
[email protected]



Reply via email to