Oh on the same note, would it be possible to change the shindig-source to shindig-java-source? Since with php the source is the binary and visa versa, having it included in a 'source' release and a 'php' release (with different path configurations, so you can't just switch from one to another) seems confusing.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Chris Chabot <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems the change to the features location (from /shindig/features to > /shindig/features/src/main/javascript/features) was also applied to the > 1.0.x branch recently, without updating php's path configuration, which > means that 'stable' branch has been broken for a while. > > I know Paul switched over the trunk a while back, but he also modified > php's config ... I wasn't aware that someone had done the same to the > *stable* branch too without making the required modifications or notifying > me... it's a bit of a shock to find that the *stable* branch that i've been > pointing everyone too, has been broken for a while. > > Fix's been committed to the 1.0.x branch, so I hope you'll be able to > generate new snapshots so we won't keep propagating broken code. > > Oh ps, when talking about PHP there are no 'binaries' nor 'artifacts', or > even 'source'; With PHP the source is the binary (even with binary op-code > caching it's still an inherently interpreted language), and artifacts used > to describe old stuff in Indiana Jones movies :) So the correct terminology > would be 'the PHP tarbals' or something similar. > > On first inspection the generated php archives look good, but I'll do a > full end to end test to make doubly sure, after the above happened I don't > feel comfortable making any assumptions (why oh why would people do breaking > things on stable and fix-only branches ;/) > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Ian Boston <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Vincent, >> Thank you for pressing on with this, I have a feeling it would have taken >> a lot longer without you. AFAICT the process looks Ok, but as you say the >> PHP bin needs review from Chris. >> Ian >> >> >> On 18 Apr 2009, at 14:22, Vincent Siveton wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >>> >>> We are close to release Shindig 1.0-incubating :) >>> I documented all the release steps in r766308. >>> This is a draft and some points can change. Comments welcome! >>> http://incubator.apache.org/shindig/community/releasing.html (need to >>> sync) >>> >>> FYI the process is actually between the points 4 and 5. All artifacts >>> are signed and staged in repository.apache.org: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-004/org/apache/shindig/ >>> The Java and PHP bin are also there: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-004/org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/ >>> >>> PHP bin is probably the most sensitive point according our last thread >>> [1]. >>> Do we need to change something in the process for PHP? >>> If no, I will start a vote soon. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Vincent >>> >>> [1] http://shindig-dev.markmail.org/message/jix2oi55oyqm7hje >>> >> >> >
