Not quite there are some things hanging from the r770209 commit thread.
But Vincent might have got to them already.
Ian
On 5 May 2009, at 18:36, Kevin Brown wrote:
Are we set, then?
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Chris Chabot <[email protected]>
wrote:
I've added an additional README.svn file, so that the main readme
file can
contain just the release based instructions, for the rest
everything still
checks out with the php version, so it's got my blessing! :)
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Ian Boston <[email protected]> wrote:
Ahh ok, I now understand, thanks.
Ian
On 30 Apr 2009, at 12:31, Vincent Siveton wrote:
2009/4/30 Ian Boston <[email protected]>:
On 30 Apr 2009, at 10:58, Vincent Siveton wrote:
LICENSE just contains the ASL2 text as per the root LICENSE.
I think so and java/LICENSE or php/LICENSE should contain
additional
licenses (specific for the impl)
um, [1] says that the LICENSE should just be the contents of
[3], and
NOTICE
should be list any other licenses contained within the distro [2]
So LICENSE should not contain additional licenses, only ASL2
You could add specific licenses see for instance [1] or [2] (my
models
;)
).
It is only the distributed licenses like Zend for php. In the Java
side, we just include libraries, so the NOTICE in the war
(generated
by Maven) should be enough.
But again I prefer that our mentors confirm this legal point.
Cheers,
Vincent
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE
[2]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.x/apache-maven/LICENSE.txt
