SGTM On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Paul Lindner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay, this is all good information. If you can clean up the jira issues to > match reality that would be great. > Right now there are 26 issues marked 1.1-M1 (which I think we'll just call > BETA1), 1 marked M2, and 1 marked RC1. > > I think we should just get 1.1-BETA1 released as-is for now and then focus > on fixing a bunch of things for BETA2. Getting 0.9 feature complete will > be > the goal for 1.1-RC1 at which point we'll cut the incubating-1.1.x branch. > > If that's acceptable I'll send out the vote for BETA1 today. > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Kevin Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Chris Chabot <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Chris Chabot <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > For PHP Shindig I think we can commit to the first or second week of > > Aug > > > > for being pretty much feature complete. > > > > > > > > Our remaining todo list is: > > > > > > > > - osapi / lightweight js: Still need to implement listMethods > > properly > > > > & make sure we set up the envirioment correctly > > > > - Albums API & content upload support: most of shindig's > > > implementation > > > > is done, but the reference implementation to verify this in > partuza > > is > > > work > > > > in progress > > > > - Anonymous viewer: almost done > > > > - OpenSocial Templates: basic support is done but has 2 or 3 > > remaining > > > > todo's (and we have 3 different implementations: java, php and js, > > > which all > > > > behave differently, something which hopefully we can fix for > vNext) > > > > - OSML: Still to be implemented > > > > - UserPrefs for REST API< > > > http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=UserPrefs_for_REST_API>and > > > Versioning > > > > Applications< > > > http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Versioning_Applications>I > > think > > > we have discarded or punted these to vNext > > > > > > > We discarded them entirely for now due to poor specifications. Java has a > > prototype implementation of manifests, but I plan on removing it since > it's > > not a part of the specification and it doesn't really work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the rest all the 0.9 changes should be done in PHP Shindig. The > > only > > > > concern I have is that we don't really have a proper test suite, > > > > > > > > > (accidental send, continuing) so there is no way to absolutely verify > > that > > > either php or java are really done and fully compliant. > > > > > > Is any one in the position where they can provide a similar overview > for > > > the > > > Java implementation, and what our expectations are for when that can be > > > release ready? > > > > > > Java is ahead of PHP on most items. So far as I'm aware the only > > unimplemented 0.9 items are minor things like support for the new syntax > > for > > the content-rewrite feature. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Chris > > > > > >
