Thanks! Sounds reasonable. Don't suppose you'd know from the top of your head where the whitelist / filter is defined so I can duplicate that?
-- Chris On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Kevin Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure that it's "no" headers -- I think it's just a strict > whitelist, > and yeah, I'm pretty sure it was done this way to save bandwidth since most > web headers are a waste. > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Chris Chabot <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey All, > > > > While debugging the UTF8 makeRequest FEED parsing, I noticed that java > > shindig doesn't include the headers in it's /makeRequest response, while > > the > > spec does state that headers should be populated. > > > > Is that intentional ? I could imagine why, since for 99% of the cases > it's > > just wasting bandwidth with useless information however in the past we > have > > had a 1% of people who wanted to use headers to communicate xml-rpc > session > > id's and sorts. > > > > For the time being I'll mimic the no-headers behavior, but wanted to > double > > check that that is indeed the correct thing to do. > > > > -- Chris > > >
