Le vendredi 07 janvier 2011 à 11:33 +0100, Hartmut Goebel a écrit :
> Am 06.01.2011 09:52, schrieb nap:
> > Yep, the broker way is cool for getting a common log file, but in the
> > begining, got local logs to see what is bad in the
> > configuration/architecture can be useful. I think I'll add a
> > "local_log" parameter in the etc/*d.ini files with void default value.
> > So if the user want local log, he just need to enable it (so you see
> > why a log module don't load for example ;) ).
> IMHO this yet another config variable is a bad idea. The standard
> logging module already delivers all we need.
> 
> The current remote logging will become a logging handler, logging can be
> configured in the daemons config file. Easy to understand for everybody.
> Local and remote logging can be switched on and of as desired,
> log-levels can be configured per handler. Logs can be filtered, etc. And
> all this is for free :-)
> 
> The remote handler may be build on top of the current remote logging
> facility. Or can be enhanced to not format the message by it self, but
> pass it on the toe remote side to be filtered there.
> 
> My idea is to switch to *completely* the standard logging module. No
> more print-statements anywhere. Everything is going via logging.

+1, the best and smarter way to go imho ;)



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web.   Learn how to 
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure 
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl 
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel

Reply via email to