Am 02.02.2011 15:00, schrieb nap: > Why not, but it will complexify the import pass (not a huge problem) > and sys.path management (more buggy part) a lot if there are too much > of them. It should be easier to read too. What cut do you propose exactly? Why does this complexify the sys.path handling? I'm not talking about sub-direcories, but about sub-packages. This only difference will be the import statements.
If we *may* introduce namespace packages some when, there may be some path frickling. But we can think about this some when later. I can not suggest a sensefull split, since I did not understand the code good enough ;-) -- Schönen Gruß - Regards Hartmut Goebel Dipl.-Informatiker (univ.), CISSP, CSSLP Goebel Consult Spezialist für IT-Sicherheit in komplexen Umgebungen http://www.goebel-consult.de Monatliche Kolumne: http://www.cissp-gefluester.de/ Goebel Consult mit Mitglied bei http://www.7-it.de
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________ Shinken-devel mailing list Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
