I get it, thanks for the explanation ;)

2013/8/21 nap <napar...@gmail.com>

>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jean-Michel Collongette <
> jean.mic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So with .pack and pack.json we double information about a pack isn't it?
>>
>>
>> No, you are mixing pack and package. A .pack is to describe what a pack
> configuration is proposing, while a package is just for a whole package
> thing, so can be a module. The .pack is not mantatory, it will be mainly
> used by configuration tool to know how to configure hosts that are using
> this pack (which macro, etc etc).
>
> So these 2 things are ortogonal, there is no problem there. The only thing
> are their names in fact that are maybe to close :p
>
>
> Jean
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
> AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
> analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
> Visit us today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Shinken-devel mailing list
> Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
>
>


-- 
Jean-Michel Collongette
jean.mic...@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and 
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, 
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. 
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel

Reply via email to