I would think that'd be a good idea - it should probably be the first thing done for sure. Then we can start publishing Maven snapshots - a lot of people have been asking for that.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jeremy Haile <[email protected]> wrote: > Since things are sort of in a holding pattern right now anyways, can we go > ahead and change the package names, etc. today after the SVN migration? > > > On Jun 11, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > Cool - the faster the better IMO. Then we can focus on the 1.0 release >> again :) >> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Haile <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I've been sort of waiting around for the naming process to get resolved. >>> I >>> think it'd be fine to go ahead and do it. >>> >>> >>> On Jun 11, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>> >>> The infra team would also like to switch over the SVN repository asap. >>> >>>> >>>> As far as I can tell, no-one other than me has committed code in the >>>> last >>>> 2 >>>> weeks due to the name rename, so I think this should be fine. >>>> >>>> If anyone feels otherwise, please speak up now, otherwise I'll ask them >>>> to >>>> change it over today. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Les >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you sir! >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Mentors, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> What do we need to do about infrastructure concerning the name >>>>>>> change? >>>>>>> Just >>>>>>> email infra@ about mailing list, Jira, Confluence, Hudson, and SVN >>>>>>> migration? Is there anything else I'm missing? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've updated INFRA-1937 and put it back into the hopper. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Alan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
