Ah, yes, that's right! Thanks for the reminder.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > The samples/aspectj basically contains tests and the aspects are > annotation-driven. > > Kalle > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't think there are functional/systems tests for annotations. >> I've basically fired up the sample applications a few times to make >> sure everything is sane, but haven't translated that to a more >> well-defined test. >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Peter Ledbrook <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> I should think so - and method-level or field-level annotations >>>> override the class-level. At least that makes sense to me. >>> >>> I don't think we should implement anything by default for field-level >>> annotations. It seems like a specialist Grails requirement to me due >>> to controller actions being closures. >>> >>> On a related topic, are there any functional tests for annotations so >>> I can check the stuff I do works? I've add one unit test, but I >>> wouldn't really be happy without a functional test or two as well. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Peter >>> >> >
