I noticed on that page that you and Craig are listed as mentors and not committers - does that mean I should remove you two from the committers list in the STATUS file?
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm always confused. I wonder if this is our status file: > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/shiro.html > > Craig? > > > Regards, > Alan > > On May 13, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> I just committed an update to the file that lists committers and their >> ASF unix id/email. >> >> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Ah - didn't know it needed to be filled in with anything. I thought >>> it was like a section directing the project committers to do fill out >>> the rest of the sections ;) >>> >>> Are names sufficient? Or do we need to list an email address or unix >>> username too? >>> >>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Project committers: >>>> >>>> Seems empty. >>>> >>>> >>>> On May 13, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>> >>>>> I can update it - my understanding is that all of the items have been >>>>> finished and warrant an 'X' next to them except for the following 3: >>>>> >>>>> -- Does the documentation site has enough information on the >>>>> architecure, design decisions and modules? >>>>> >>>>> I will update the documentation to cover some more things tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> Exit Milestone: >>>>> organisational acceptance: >>>>> -- Has the board accepted moving to a existing/new PMC? >>>>> Incubator sign-off: >>>>> -- Has the Incubator decided that the project has accomplished all >>>>> of the above tasks? >>>>> >>>>> Naturally I can't answer these two. But could the mentors take a look >>>>> at the file (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shiro/STATUS) >>>>> and concur that they agree that all others are completed? I can >>>>> commit the file after there is consensus. >>>>> >>>>> Les >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> They're pretty religious about that STATUS file in our root. Can you >>>>>> guys >>>>>> take the time to update this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Alan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 13, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Awesome - thanks Alan. I think after we get our 1.0 release out, >>>>>>> we'll be in good shape to try to graduate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The message below was completely stolen from Matt Hogstrom but is >>>>>>>> relevant >>>>>>>> for us we well. Note that I removed a bit, "Releases are >>>>>>>> happening". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I recently saw a note on podling graduation requirements and it >>>>>>>> occurred >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> me that there has never been a lot of discussion about what that >>>>>>>> means. >>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>> including a link to the graduation requirements page so folks will >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> sense of what the Incubator PMC is looking for in terms of >>>>>>>> graduating a >>>>>>>> podling. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Overall the community has been doing well. The user community is >>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> code and asking questions / filing JIRAs, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Take a look at this link to get a sense of some of the other areas >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> people will look at to determine if a podling is ready to graduate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Graduation+Requirements >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > >
