How about that, the release worked on the first try. Guess I've learned a thing or two about releasing with Maven along the way. Props to Maven folks for super clear yet concise instructions.
The staging repository is at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheshiro-002/ The Maven site/documentation is at http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/static/1.0.0-incubating. This is the final location for the site. Les, would you like to do the honors and send the official vote email out? There's a sample template at http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apache-release.html. Since it's our first release though maybe you want to add a bit more description and maybe mention that since there were some last minute package changes people should actually test the binaries before voting, perhaps extend the voting time from minimum 72 hours. Kalle On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > On that note, I think we should release 1.0.0. Current Maven > versioning scheme works "best" with x.x.x numbering (see > http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/version-rules.html). > It'd also would make sensible to then reserve the incremental version > (the last component) for bug fixes and allow using minor versions for > new (compatible) feature releases. In essence, after releasing 1.0.0, > we'd prepare the trunk for development of 1.1.0 and create 1.0.x > branch for bug fixes and continue feature development, bug fixes etc. > in the trunk until we identify a feature set we don't want to or won't > make it to the next release, at which time we'd pull a 1.1x branch and > update the trunk for development of 1.2.x (or even 2.0.x). > > Kalle > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that we're long >> overdue for our first release ;) >> >> So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to take a crack >> at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues that >> absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd like to >> post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to speak-up if >> they see something that they think should be included but I missed. >> >> I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should concretely >> define our first release, and to get it out as soon as possible from >> now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can finish all >> the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January. >> >> Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this, otherwise, I'll >> get started as soon as possible organizing the existing issues. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Les >> >
