Les, have you/are you going to write up the resolution? You should probably come up with initial draft but I'll certainly help revise it as needed. We could also hold a community graduation vote (not a requirement but recommended).
Kalle On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: >> So, what are the next steps towards graduation? >> Is all that is left is to hold a vote? > > The page at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html gives > you a pretty good idea. AFAIK, we don't have any incubation action > items left open but the biggest thing before the graduation vote is > preparing the resolution. You should be the chair in my opinion. > There's a bit of bureaucracy to finish if and once the vote is > accepted, but manageable. It'd make sense to follow up with 1.1 > release shortly after the graduation to make the most out of free > publicity, but given that I'd assume it's still going to be a few > weeks before all is set and done, might make sense to start now. > > Kalle > > >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Kalle Korhonen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> I started by copying-and-pasting bits of the source code shown on the >>>> website, so our mentors recommended that we get his permission last >>>> year just in case, which is why that statement is included in the >>>> existing notice file. As long as the URL for his website remains (his >>>> 'attribution clause' requested of us), we can remove anything else. >>> >>> Yes, assumed so. Rephrased the wording as suggested and committed a new >>> version. >>> >>>>> The Spring source notice is equally straight-forwarded. Spring is >>>> That line was in there originally because I thought there was an >>>> attribution requirement by Spring, but I double-checked and that only >>>> applies to us redistributing their *documentation*. We're definitely >>>> not doing that, so we can move that part entirely. >>> >>> Right, I kept the Spring notice there but rephrased. Both serve more >>> as courtesy notices as well as for copyrights, which is the primary >>> purpose of the NOTICE file AFAIK. >>> >>> Kalle >>> >> >
