On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Martin DeMello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 'stroke none' and 'fill none' seem neater than 'nostroke' and > 'nofill', in that 'none' can be passed as an argument.
Looking at the implementation of nostroke(), it looks like stroke(nil) may already work. I don't think there needs to be anything called "none" when you've already got "nil". -- Seth Thomas Rasmussen http://greatseth.com
