Hi Ed, Yes the 400cc head is the one that is non-conforming. That is the one listed on the USGA web site.
My problem is I have a local tourny guy giving one of my customers a hard time about the head. This guy is saying that just because it is not listed, does not make it legal. My customer is 60 years old, won the tourny, his average drive is 30-50 yards longer then it was last year with a Nike head. This idiot is saying that proves the head must be too hot. He refuses to believe that a driver can be built using no-name components and be able to outdrive the big names. As far as I know the USGA will not give out a list of heads that they have tested that have passed. So I thought I would try to find the e-mail about who had the head tested and see if I could get a copy of the letter the USGA sent back to them. It is just a bunch of sour grapes, but it is begining to bother my customer, and is costing me quite a bit of business at that club. I think it was one of the major suppliers that had the letter, diamond tour, or tour something. George --- Ed Reeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > George, > Are you interested in whether the Integra 450 Beta > Ti head is > legal or not? The only thing you should be worried > about is > whether it is on the USGA non-conforming list. > > About that same time Integra had a non-conforming > head, the 400cc > 10.5 degree model. > > Or is there another question? > > /Ed > > George Huson wrote: > > I know last year or maybe the year before, someone > did some research on > > the Integra 450 Beta Ti head, maybe Bernie, I > remember we got an e-mail > > from one of the component companies that had a > letter from USGA saying > > the head was legal. Archives and can't find > anything on it. I checked > > USGA and the 450 is not on the non-confroming > list. If anyone > > remembers it and has a copy could they please > forward it to my direct > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thanks > > George Huson > > ByGeorge Custom Clubs > > > > > > > > > > > >
