How do i pay you to get one??

PayPal..??

Thanks
John

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Kaufman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Miscellaneous thoughts


> Hi Jen,
>
> I offer a laser and a holder that attaches to a shaft. It can be used with
> raw shafts or finished clubs. The laser/holder combination is $15. They
were
> a hot item at the PCS show. I had about 40 with me at my booth and sold
out.
>
> Cheers,
>
> John kaufman
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jen Kuntz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 11:57 AM
> Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Miscellaneous thoughts
>
>
> > No problem.
> >
> > What I recall of it was he had a laser pen (?) that he attached on the
> > end of the shaft (can't remember how) and he clamped the shaft in what I
> > think was the clamping device he used for the frequency meter (he has
> > one of John Kaufman's machines).  He would put the shaft in parallel to
> > the workbench (if that isn't obvious!) and twang it parallel with the
> > workbench as well with the laser pointing at the wall so you would see
> > the visual pattern quite easily.  Some oscillated a fair bit and the
> > "good" ones eventually oscillated at a relatively flat line.  He would
> > rotate the shaft until he found the "best" FLO pattern.  (I may not be
> > using the best terminology here).
> >
> > It was quite simple looking.  What I am hoping to get more information
> > on is how he attached the laser pointer and where he got it etc.  The
> > clamping would also be a question as I do not have a freq. meter and I
> > think I would be "stuck" clamping in a vice.
> >
> > If I get more info, I will pass it on.
> >
> > Jen
> >
> > BTW - this is Patrick Inglis that I am speaking of... used to be on
> > ShopTalk but I don't think he is anymore.
> >
> >
> > comgolf wrote:
> > > Hi Jen:
> > > I'd like for you to explain that laser device after you see it if you
> don't
> > > mind.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > John
>
>

Reply via email to