Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 06/01/2008, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes. The following is the only hunk which should be omitted:
>>
>> diff -Naur -X /home/teastep/shorewall/trunk/tools/build/exclude.txt
>> shorewall-perl-4.0.7.1/Shorewall/Tc.pm shorewall-perl-4.0.7.2/Shorewall/Tc.pm
>> --- shorewall-perl-4.0.7.1/Shorewall/Tc.pm 2007-11-16
>> 07:57:37.000000000 -0800
>> +++ shorewall-perl-4.0.7.2/Shorewall/Tc.pm 2008-01-02
>> 08:02:43.000000000 -0800
>> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@
>>
>> if ( $inband ) {
>> emit ( "run_tc qdisc add dev $device handle ffff: ingress",
>> - "run_tc filter add dev $device parent ffff: protocol ip
>> prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${inband}kbit burst 10k drop
>> flowid :1"
>> + "run_tc filter add dev $device parent ffff: protocol ip
>> prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${inband}kbit burst 10k drop"
>> );
>> }
>>
>
> OK thanks.
>
> Actually, looking a bit closer, it appears that
> shorewall-perl-4.0.7.tar.bz2 from the base directory already has
> patch-perl-4.0.7.1 applied, which is very confusing. From the previous
> discussoin, I had understood that the point release patches were to be
> applied in increasing order to the tarballs in base. Did I totally
> misunderstand?I have no clue how that happened. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
