On 2/9/11 5:36 PM, Steven Jan Springl wrote: >> Do you plan to do additional testing of 4.4.17-RC1? > There is only one oustanding issue that I know of. > > There are still a large number of iptables targets (CHECKSUM, CLASSIFY, > CONNSECMARK etc) that if specified as the chain name in an accounting rule > will cause an iptables-restore error. > > If you are happy to live with this situation then my testing of 4.4.167-RC1 > is > complete. > > If not, I will get a defintive list together for iptables, iptables6 & > xtables-addons.
As I mentioned earlier, the Netfilter team are always busy inventing new targets; so we'll never be foolproof on all systems. I've updated the accounting manpages with advice to include lower-case, digits, '-' or '_' in accounting chain names. I think that is enough. Thanks! -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
