On 2/13/11 12:54 PM, Dominic Benson wrote:
> 
> On 13 Feb 2011, at 16:08, Tom Eastep wrote:
> 
>> On 2/13/11 5:48 AM, Dominic Benson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't know what the best proper fix would be. If this is an isolated
>>> example of ipv4/ipv6 compatibility  trouble, then perhaps the global
>>> address could be supplied from the shorewall/shorewall6 scripts
>>> themselves, per the iptables command. If it isn't, possibly a neater
>>> version of the include path selection I used would be better. If there
>>> is a consensus, I could concoct an appropriate patch.
>>
>> The attached patch should fix you up.
> 
> Thanks. I didn't notice that sub; that tweak is considerably cleaner than 
> mine!

Let me know if you find other problems. I've not installed the IPv6
TPROXY patches so I haven't even documented its options in the
Shorewall6 manpages.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel

Reply via email to