On 9/9/12 2:43 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > >> Yes -- the priority for rules generated by tcfilters is 10 for IPv4 and >> 11 for IPv6. >> >> Attached is a patch that adds a PRIORITY column to the tcfilters file. >> The minimum priority that can be specified in the column is 12. >> > Hmm, there is something I am not completely clear about - is the > "priority" column specified in tcclasses the one which should be taken > into account, but it isn't (is this what your patch addresses)? I > presume the same question is going to arise with tcrules as well - is > the tcclasses' priority column value ignored there as well (I can't see > any priority specified for outgoing traffic in tc statements as well)?
The two priorities are unrelated. The new PRIORITY column governs the order in which filters are evaluated. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
