>> That doesn't seem to be working as expected - if I have "blacklist" >> defined in any of my zones, and even if I do not have blacklist (but >> do have blrules), blacklst/blackout chains are still created (and >> they are empty!) alongside the "new" ~blacklist0/~blacklist1, which >> isn't what is needed. > > (Surprisingly large) patch attached. OK, this now works when the blacklist file is empty, but when there is some content in it, as well as in the blrules file, both files are taken into account, creating blacklst/blackout as well as ~blacklistX chains. Is that how it is supposed to work? I thought blrules took precedence over the deprecated blacklist? Is that not the case?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
