On Thursday 07 Mar 2013 16:27:21 Tom Eastep wrote: > The first bug fix below should receive wider testing. So I have uploaded > 4.5.14 RC 2. I went ahead and included a simple new feature (see below), > but I neglected to include the change that allows generating '-m > multiport --ports <port list>' by placing '=' SOURCE PORT(S) columns. > Given that it won't affect existing configurations, I will add that > feature to 4.5.14 final (or to RC 3 if required).
Tom After the application of the MULTIPORT patch the following netmap entry: DNAT:O 192.168.168.0/24 eth1 10.199.0.0/16 88.88.88.88 tcp 102,103 201,301 Generates the following iptables rule: -A eth1_out -p 6 -s 88.88.88.88 -d 192.168.168.0/24 -m multiport -m multiport --dports 102,103 -m multiport --sports 201,301 -j RAWDNAT --to-dest 10.199.0.0/16 Which produces the following error message: iptables-restore v1.4.18: multiport expection an option Steven. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
