On 06/01/2013 10:11 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: > On 06/01/2013 10:08 AM, Dash Four wrote: >> >> Tom Eastep wrote: >>> On 06/01/2013 09:48 AM, Dash Four wrote: >>> >>>> Tom Eastep wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm assuming that IFLOG is also a default action? What parameters are >>>>> being passed in that case? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> What does a "default action" mean exactly? >>>> >>> >>> http://www.shorewall.net/Actions.html#Default >>> >>> This is addressing the issue where the tunnels file is mentioned in the >>> warning message. >>> >> I don't get this at all - my "tunnels" file is *empty*! I do have the >> IFLOG action used in the policy file (if that's what you asked), but 1) >> I don't see why is this a problem for shorewall; and 2) what is the >> relevance between IFLOG and /etc/shorewall/tunnels? > > The fact that tunnels is mentioned in the warning message is a harmless > bug. The compiler is applying default actions when these warnings are > issued; that is the significant point. >
Possibly for both of these warning message cases, the best way to
proceed is for you to:
shorewall trace compile > trace 2>&1
And send me the 'trace' file privately.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
