On 2/16/2014 11:58 AM, Dash Four wrote:
> 
>> I get your point, but I don't want to have any broadcast/multicast
>>  traffic traversed at all. In other words, I don't want to have 
>> "normal" traffic traversing through "multicast" or "broadcast"
>> rules unnecessarily as I am simply not interested in having that
>> kind of traffic - there is no need (at least in my case). The
>> default action on OUTPUT is fine, better still, if I have a single
>> set or action/rule at the bottom of that chain for such traffic,
>> before the default OUTPUT action - that would be even better.
> I should make it clearer that I could manage to get such action
> inserted in the OUTPUT chain - the above wasn't a request for you to
> do anything, I was just canvassing an opinion.

If you define a fw->all policy, then Shorewall will enforce that policy
at the end of the OUTPUT chain. You can then define the default action
for that policy to do anything you want.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android apps run on BlackBerry 10
Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps.
Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more.
Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience.  Start now.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel

Reply via email to