On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 22:32 +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > It's an almost completely unrelated problem to what shorewall does, > and quagga already does the job of capturing non-trivial routing > setups in a set of config files quite neatly, so the answer is likely > "no".
I do use quagga as well. Does it solve the problem however of ensuring that packets leave by the interface which they arrived? The only way I know of achieving this is by the connection marking that shorewall employs. > (I don't know offhand whether quagga would solve your problem, because > frankly I haven't been paying any attention to it - but it's solved > all my dynamic routing problems to date, despite being intended for > far more complex scenarios, so if it doesn't currently work in this > case, any development attention would be better aimed in that > direction) Do you have two ISP connections, each with their own "consumer-level" IP address? i.e. I am specifically not referring to a single routable address space routed via traditional (true) multi-homing where you use the same address through both providers. b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
