On Tue, 2007-03-04 at 17:34 +0200, hans lux wrote:
> 
> i've read that article but can't find the problem i have in there.

That's probably because this is not a shorewall problem.

> at the moment i have the following situation
> 
> eth0 = inet
> eth2   = local (192.168.0.0/24)------ tunnel ----- 192.168.33.0/24
> eth2:0 = local (10.106.121.0)----- tunnel ------ 10.106.99.0/24
> 
> now i need to access the 10.106.99.0/24 from the 192.168.0.0/24.

This is a routing problem and nothing to do with shorewall I think.

Have you tried this configuration without activating your shorewall
rules first to prove that it's a shorewall problem?  There is nothing
about filtering or natting that should be needed to make this work.
It's all in the routing.

b.

-- 
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.

Brian J. Murrell

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to